Weekly Market Recap: Is The Market Setting A Bull Trap?

History shows it's time like these when recovery rallies top out & reverse

May 10, 2025

The current stock market rally looks long in the tooth, warns portfolio manager Lance Roberts.

In his opinion, this looks likely to be a good time to lighten up on positions, capture gains and prepare for a possible resumption to the downside.

Stocks are exhibiting a classic correction trajectory, which historically has been punctuated with pronounced sharp rebounds like we've seen over the recent two weeks.

Investors are starting to catch FOMO and aggressively jump back in.

This may be the *exact* wrong time to do so.

Lance and I discuss his argument for why, as well as the latest trade developments and Federal Reserve guidance from this week.

For everything that mattered to markets this week, click here or on the video below:

RECENT VIDEOS

SET YOUR WEALTH UP FOR SUCCESS: Schedule a free, no-commitment consultation with one of Thoughtful Money’s endorsed financial advisors now to identify the right steps to position your portfolio advantageously for the rest of 2025:

Schedule Your Free Consultation

TM ON PODCAST PLAYERS

Just a reminder that if you prefer to listen to my interviews on your podcast player, Thoughtful Money is now available on the major podcast platforms:

I’m so grateful to everyone who has kindly supported me by becoming a premium subscriber to this Substack. It’s making an important difference in helping me afford the substantial startup costs of running Thoughtful Money.

Premium supporters now receive my “Adam’s Notes” summaries to the interviews on this channel, plus periodic advance-viewing and/or exclusive content not made available to the public, and now our popular MacroPass™ service.

If you, too, would like to become a premium subscriber to this Substack (it’s only $0.52/day), then sign up now:

But whether you do or not, get ready for another week of more great content ahead. We have interviews with Grant Williams, Stephanie Pomboy, Danielle DiMartino Booth, Bill Fleckenstein & Sven Henrich.

Stay tuned!

cheers,

My sincere thanks to Lance Roberts and his team at Real Investment Advice for kindly making their weekly Bull/Bear market report available to the Thoughtful Money audience below:

Earnings Revision Shows Sharp Decline

By Lance Roberts | May 10, 2025

Inside This Week’s Bull Bear Report

Negative Earnings Revision Shows Sharp Decline
How We Are Trading It
Research Report – Employment Data Confirms Economy Is Slowing
YouTube – Before The Bell
Market Statistics
Stock Screens
Portfolio Trades This Week

The Fed Holds Rates Steady

Last week, we discussed that while the market improved sharply, the underlying economic data continues to decline steadily. However, given that the data was not recessionary, the market rallied and took out some key resistance levels. To wit:

“This past week, two reports confirmed the economy is slowing. First, there was the weak GDP report, which showed growth of roughly one percent, after discounting the impact of the trade deficit. Secondly, while the employment number was higher than expected, job growth also slowed. However, those reports should have tempered market enthusiasm as they reduced hopes for Fed rate cuts. However, the market pushed higher as investors raced to jump back into “risk assets” as the market cleared initial resistance at the 20-DMA and reversed all of the ‘Liberation Day” losses.‘”

The market paused its advance before the Fed meeting on Wednesday, which was remarkably uneventful. The Fed held rates steady as expected and did not provide much guidance regarding its forecast for future rate cuts. However, on Thursday, the Trump administration discussed its first “trade deal” with the UK. Notably, the US has a trade surplus with the UK, making negotiating a trade deal easier. Nonetheless, announcing a long-awaited agreement gave the market hope that more deals eventually will follow. Unfortunately, other trade deals with actual “trade deficit” countries may be tougher and take much longer to negotiate.

Technically, the market is beginning to repair much of the damage from the “Liberation Day” tariff announcements. However, on Thursday, we made the case that we are still tracing out the 2022 market analogy. As shown in the weekly chart below, in 2022, the market sold off and triggered a weekly moving-average crossover in early March. Immediately following that selloff, the market rallied back to those longer-term moving averages and briefly broke above. That “bear market rally,” sucked investors back into the market, just to “rug pull” from beneath them. Such is how correctional markets work.

You will notice that the recent selloff has also triggered that same moving average crossover, and immediately coincided with a reflexive rally. The market has broken above the first moving average, challenging the second as investors and the media are increasingly bullish on stocks. Will the market “rug pull” on investors once again? I don’t know. However, as stated, if we are in a more protracted market correction, the risk is elevated, and we could see another retracement to support before this correction is complete.

Reasons The Correction Could Be Over, Or Not

It is always difficult to say whether this is a “bear market” rally while you are in the midst of it. In hindsight, these things are easy to identify, and investors have plenty of reasons to play the “could’ve should’ve” game. However, some valid arguments exist about why the recent correction was just that, and may now be over.

Q1 earnings were above average, which is boosting investor confidence, particularly in the “Mag 7” and related AI stories.
Investor sentiment is improving from extremely low levels and is not overly bullish.
Treasury yields are coming down, along with inflationary pressures.
Uncertainty around tariffs, the main driver of the correction, is rapidly becoming less of a threat.
Recession risks have fallen sharply with the latest economic data.
Market valuations have corrected somewhat in recent weeks.

Of course, there are reasons for concern that should also not be dismissed.

Economic data and consumer confidence are getting weaker.
Political policy uncertainty remains elevated.
Despite the recent rally, the market still suffers significant technical damage.
Investors were not prepared for the recent magnitude of the correction, providing potentially significant sellers wanting to get out. (Trapped longs)
Monetary policy uncertainty remains elevated.
Valuations, while reduced, remain well elevated from the long-term median and average.

With balanced risks, investors will likely benefit by remaining cautious and managing risk exposures until a more bullish path is exposed.

Notably, the issue of valuations is essential to consider. Valuations are a function of earnings, and this week’s subject focuses on S&P Global’s recent slashing of earnings estimates for the S&P 500 Index.

Wall Street Versus S&P Global

It has been an interesting few weeks for the markets and the economy. In early April, the market declined over the threat of tariffs and expectations that such would spark higher inflation rates and potentially push the economy into a recession. Such a backdrop would suggest that corporate earnings would come under attack, and the negative earnings revisions would be expected. Such is what we saw globally as negative earnings revisions from Wall Street analysts spiked higher.

However, we noticed an oddity by S&P Global, the purveyor of the S&P 500 Index, as we wrote on May 3rd:

“While the first quarter earnings season has been okay, earnings over the next few quarters will likely be revised lower. So far, earnings estimates for the S&P 500 index (by S&P Global) remain extremely optimistic. In the last two months, S&P Global has raised its estimates for 2026 GAAP earnings (reported) from $289/share to $292/share. As we have discussed previously, these estimates are exceedingly deviated from the long-term growth trend of earnings.”

That optimism was stunning, particularly when economic growth rates are slowing. To ensure you understand the importance of that statement, reviewing the historical correlation between economic growth and earnings is crucial.

What Drives Earnings Growth

Historically, GDP growth has closely correlated with corporate earnings growth. Data from the Federal Reserve shows that, since 1948, a 1% increase in real GDP growth has translated to roughly a 6% increase in S&P 500 earnings on average. This relationship underscores why GDP is a cornerstone for assessing earnings trends. We can also see this visually.

“Since 1947, earnings per share have grown at 7.7% annually, while the economy expanded by 6.40% annually. That close relationship in growth rates should be logical, particularly given the significant role that consumer spending has in the GDP equation.” – Market Forecasts Are Very Bullish

A better way to visualize this data is to look at the correlation between the annual change in earnings growth and inflation-adjusted GDP. There are periods when earnings deviate from underlying economic activity. However, those periods are due to pre- or post-recession earnings fluctuations. Currently, economic and earnings growth are very close to the long-term correlation.

However, that assumes that GDP continues growing at roughly 2% annually. If economic growth deteriorates, as expected, then maintaining corporate earnings at projected levels becomes more difficult. As discussed in yesterday’s #Macroview, there is no evidence that the economy is slipping into a recession. However, if you want to know if an economic decline will evolve into a recession, there is one key factor to consider: consumer spending.

“Consumer spending comprises nearly 70% of the GDP calculation, and everything else, from business investment to imports and exports, is a function of the consumer’s “demand.” In other words, if the consumer is slowing down or contracting spending, businesses will not “invest” in expansion projects, increasing employment, or buying more products for resale. That relationship is shown in the chart below, which compares PCE to jobs and private investment.”

What should be evident is that the economic data is starting to weigh on corporate earnings growth.

S&P’s Negative Earnings Revision Catchup

In other words, as the economy slows, consumer demand falls. The chart below shows real GDP compared to the annual rate of change in GAAP-reported earnings. Notice the correlation.

Given the slowdown in economic growth rates, it is unsurprising that, as of May 1st, S&P Global finally acquiesced and revised earnings estimates lower. However, this wasn’t a mild earnings revision but a slashing of estimates from their April 15th expectation of $292/share in 2026 to just $274. Furthermore, full-year 2025 reported earnings estimates were cut by nearly $20/share from $258/share to just $238/share.

While this is S&P Global’s first negative earnings revision for the S&P 500 index, it likely won’t be the last. The current linear growth trend for S&P 500 earnings is around $220/share in 2026. As shown in the chart below, earnings growth tends to revert to the long-term trend. You should notice in the chart below that since 1936, earnings haven’t stayed at the top of the long-term growth trend channel for long. Historically, either economic recessions or some event reverses earnings from the peak to the trough of the channel regularly. The current exponential growth trend for earnings is $195/share.

The chart below better visualizes that deviation from the long-term growth trend. (The chart includes the latest negative earnings revision.)

Deviation of earnings from growth trend.

In other words, despite S&P Global’s earnings revision, estimates remain overly optimistic despite slower economic growth. However, such is the problem that investors regularly face with analysts’ forecasts.

The Historical Problem Of Analyst Market Forecasts

Here is the critical question for investors: “If the market is priced based on future earnings expectations, then how reliable are those estimates?” The chart below is from Yardeni Research and shows the evolution of earnings forecasts over time. You will notice that analysts’ initial forecasts were wrong in almost every case.

This tendency to overshoot earnings growth has been attributed to several factors:

Delayed Reaction to Macroeconomic Signals: Analysts have tended to underestimate the lag effect of monetary tightening on corporate profits. Additionally, initial forecasts are often based on historical growth patterns but do not always reflect sudden economic or policy changes.
Corporate Optimism: Companies often guide higher during earnings calls, buoying analyst expectations. Furthermore, as the actual economic environment proves more difficult, earnings usually fail to meet these expectations, resulting in post-reporting season disappointments.
Investment Banking Needs: Wall Street is in the business of selling products. Therefore, increased estimates lower forward valuations, improving investor appetites, particularly for high-growth companies. A previous study showed that the accuracy and timeliness of earnings forecasts are the LEAST important for analysts. (Read: The Truth About Wall Street Analysis)

In other words, if you bought stocks at the beginning of virtually every analyst’s annual forecast, based on the assumption that earnings would grow, you overpaid for investments virtually every given year. However, in most cases, you make money anyway, so why worry about it?

The reason to worry is that over-estimation eventually leads to mean-reverting events, like now.

Valuations Remain An Issue

The biggest single problem with Wall Street today and in the past is the consistent disregard for the possibilities of unexpected, random events. In a 2010 study by the McKinsey Group, they found that analysts have been persistently overly optimistic for 25 years. During the 25-year time frame, Wall Street analysts pegged earnings growth at 10-12% a year when, in reality, earnings grew at 6%, which, as we have discussed in the past, is the economy’s growth rate. This is why using forward earnings estimates as a valuation metric is so incredibly flawed—the estimates are always overly optimistic.

Here is a good example. Q1 estimates started at $226/share. However, by the time Q1 earnings reports were nearing completion, earnings were closer to $217/share. Therefore, if you were buying stocks based on future earnings expectations of $226/share, you overpaid for the value you received.

Now, earnings into 2026 are being revised sharply lower, so valuation risk remains elevated. Valuations recently declined as the “P” fell, but the “E” remained stable. Now the “P” is rising as the “E” declines, increasing the valuation issue for investors.

As stated above, the market will face many headwinds in 2025. However, three key factors must exist to sustain historically high earnings growth and record corporate profitability.

Economic growth must remain more robust than the average 20-year growth rate. (Low probability)
Wage and labor growth must reverse (weaken) to sustain historically elevated profit margins.(Low probability)
Both interest rates and inflation need to decline to support consumer spending. (Challenging but possible)

While analysts are optimistic about economic and earnings growth in 2025, the potential risks to those forecasts and further downward earnings revisions may pose challenges.

We suggest remaining somewhat cautious with risk-taking.

How We Are Trading It

We continue to manage our portfolios in a manner that allows us to participate in the market increase but still hedge against underlying risk. As such, we suggest rebalancing risk as necessary and adjusting portfolio holdings to provide some hedge against a sudden pickup in volatility. While the number of stocks trading above their 50 and 200-DMAs is rising, indicating more substantial breadth and participation in the market, it also serves as a warning. As shown, previous higher levels of participation also coincide with market peaks and short-term corrections.

The trick to navigating markets is not trying to “time” the market to buy or sell the exact bottom or top. That is impossible. Successful long-term management is understanding when “enough is enough” and being willing to take profits and protect your gains. That is our situation for many stocks after the robust rally from the recent lows. With markets within a corrective process and trading below long-term moving averages, the opportunity to rebalance risk and reduce portfolio volatility is available. However, many investors will opt to “hope” for further gains, but will sell at lower levels if the correction continues.

That advice remains relevant this week as we head further into May, which wraps up the seasonally strong period of the year. A pickup in volatility, some surprises, and disappointments will be the nature of the market as economic and tariff-related news rules the headlines. The trick will be to navigate the outcome without making emotionally driven decisions.

Continue to follow the rules and stick to your discipline. (Read our article on “What Is Risk” for a complete list of rules)

Have a great weekend.

(Note: The allocation below contains a 5% short S&P 500 position in the ETF allocation.)

Feel free to reach out if you want to navigate these uncertain waters with expert guidance. Our team specializes in helping clients make informed decisions in today’s volatile markets.

Research Report

SimpleVisor Top & Bottom Performers By Sector

S&P 500 Weekly Tear Sheet

Relative Performance Analysis

As noted last week, the market support was held this past week, even though markets tried to correct somewhat. However, buyers kept stepping in, particularly corporations with the open buyback window, which kept the market from correcting much of its short-term overbought condition. Other than Staples, GBonds, and Healthcare, everything else remains overbought. As such, we could see some rotation into those oversold market areas (more defensive) as the recent rally pauses.

Technical Composite

The technical overbought/sold gauge comprises several price indicators (R.S.I., Williams %R, etc.), measured using “weekly” closing price data. Readings above “80” are considered overbought, and below “20” are oversold. The market peaks when those readings are 80 or above, suggesting prudent profit-taking and risk management. The best buying opportunities exist when those readings are 20 or below.

The current reading is 48.55 out of a possible 100.

Portfolio Positioning “Fear / Greed” Gauge

The “Fear/Greed” gauge is how individual and professional investors are “positioning” themselves in the market based on their equity exposure. From a contrarian position, the higher the allocation to equities, the more likely the market is closer to a correction than not. The gauge uses weekly closing data.

NOTE: The Fear/Greed Index measures risk from 0 to 100. It is a rarity that it reaches levels above 90.

The current reading is 66.56 out of a possible 100.

Relative Sector Analysis

Most Oversold Sector Analysis

Sector Model Analysis & Risk Ranges

How To Read This Table

The table compares the relative performance of each sector and market to the S&P 500 index.
“MA XVER” (Moving Average Crossover) is determined by the short-term weekly moving average crossing positively or negatively with the long-term weekly moving average.
The risk range is a function of the month-end closing price and the “beta” of the sector or market. (Ranges reset on the 1st of each month)
The table shows the price deviation above and below the weekly moving averages.

As noted last week, given that most markets and sectors are trading with “bearish” crossovers, the correction process has likely not ended, so remain cautious. Historically, when most markets and sectors are trading bearish, the correction process is more entrenched and lasts longer than normal market pullbacks. While the market rally “paused” this past week, I suspect we could continue to see more turbulence in the week ahead.

Weekly SimpleVisor Stock Screens

We provide three stock screens each week from SimpleVisor.

This week, we are searching for the Top 20:

Relative Strength Stocks
Momentum Stocks
Technical Strength W/ Dividends

(Click Images To Enlarge)

RSI Screen

Momentum Screen

Technically Strong With Dividends

SimpleVisor Portfolio Changes

We post all of our portfolio changes as they occur at SimpleVisor:

No Changes This Week

~ Lance Roberts, C.I.O., RIA Advisors

Thoughtful Money LLC is a Registered Investment Advisor Promoter.

We produce & distribute educational content geared for the individual investor. It’s important to note that this content is NOT investment advice, individual or otherwise, nor should be construed as such.

We recommend that most investors, especially if inexperienced, should consider benefiting from the direction and guidance of a qualified financial advisor registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or state securities regulators who can develop & implement a personalized financial plan based on a customer’s unique goals, needs & risk tolerance.

IMPORTANT NOTE: There are risks associated with investing in securities.

Investing in stocks, bonds, exchange traded funds, mutual funds, money market funds, and other types of securities involve risk of loss. Loss of principal is possible. Some high risk investments may use leverage, which will accentuate gains & losses. Foreign investing involves special risks, including a greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods.

A security’s or a firm’s past investment performance is not a guarantee or predictor of future investment performance.

Thoughtful Money and the Thoughtful Money logo are trademarks of Thoughtful Money LLC.

Adam Taggart's Thoughtful Money®

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?